When you win a bid, everything can feel like it is going your way — until defective plans, slow RFI responses, or other owner interference upend the work and costs pile up. The sense that you got burned is real, but it is not enough. Courts require that feeling to become something the law recognizes as damages.
Contract damages put the non-breaching party in the position it would have occupied had the contract been performed.
Two gates control recovery: The loss must flow from the breach (causation), and the amount must be shown with reasonable certainty. Mathematical precision is not required, but the estimate needs an objective foundation in facts, figures, or data rather than pure guesswork. The parties’ contract should always be reviewed first, because waivers of consequential damages, no-damages-for-delay clauses, or liability caps can limit or eliminate recovery before proof even begins.
Two methods illustrate how these gates work in practice.
An expert witness is not always required. Straightforward lost-profits claims, for example, can sometimes rest on a knowledgeable company officer’s testimony backed by objective records. More complex analyses such as a measured mile typically need specialized opinion.
In every case the claim is only as strong as the underlying record. Accurate bids, contemporaneous daily reports, schedules, cost data, and clear links between specific impacts and specific costs built during the project — not after the dispute arises — make the difference between a recoverable claim and speculation.
For a fuller discussion of these principles, the measured mile and total cost methods, when an expert helps, and practical steps for building the record from day one, see the recent ConsensusDocs article I co-authored with Katie McCracken, It’s More Than a Feeling: Proving Construction Damages and When You Should Hire an Expert to Help Do It.
